DLM LAW

The attorneys at DLM LAW have represented inventors, investors, entrepreneurs and business owners in complex legal disputes for nearly three decades.

When “KN95” Means KN95: The Power of Product Labels

The Ninth Circuit makes clear that courts will treat product descriptions as enforceable commitments, and that failing to challenge damages at the right time can lock in a seven-figure judgment. Bluemar Promotions, LLC v. Vonnic, Inc. (9th Cir. Feb. 6, 2026). When businesses buy or sell goods, even simple descriptions on invoices and packaging can […]

When “KN95” Means KN95: The Power of Product Labels Read More »

When Assignment Language Cuts Off Arbitration Rights

A recent Maryland Supreme Court ruling underscores a risk that lenders and contract purchasers often overlook: not every term in a multi-document transaction automatically carries over to an assignee, even when it feels like it should. Lyles v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., 2025 WL 3274817 (Md. 2025) For businesses that regularly buy contracts or loan

When Assignment Language Cuts Off Arbitration Rights Read More »

Lessons from a Contract Assignment Gone Wrong

How Can the Wording of Assignment and Integration Clauses Determine Which Rights an Assignee Actually Receives? Lyles v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., 2025 WL 3274817 (Md. 2025) For businesses that regularly buy contracts or loan portfolios, a recent Maryland Supreme Court decision is a reminder that companies cannot assume every term in the dealer’s paperwork

Lessons from a Contract Assignment Gone Wrong Read More »

A Higher Price Isn’t Always the Best Deal

A Maryland court reinforced how careful deal process, documentation, and stockholder approval can shield directors from post-closing litigation. Special Situations Fund III QP, L.P. v. TravelCenters of America Inc., 2025 WL 3280907 (Md. Ct. App. 2025) When a public company agrees to be sold, its board still must navigate competing bids, deal protections, and stockholder

A Higher Price Isn’t Always the Best Deal Read More »

When Payment Disputes Go Federal: Lessons from a Miller Act Showdown

The clash in Colorado Custom Rock Corp. v. G&C Fab-Con, LLC, reveals how blurred expectations and unfinished paperwork can turn routine government projects into courtroom battles. In a dispute over unpaid work on a federal construction project, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s rulings denying motions made before, during, and

When Payment Disputes Go Federal: Lessons from a Miller Act Showdown Read More »